The matricial equation of is with
where are the coordinates of with respect to and are the coordinates of with respect to
I'm having a great deal of trouble seeing how the following map was done. It isn't even a problem but simply an example (#1.3) which can be seen on the page the following link leads to:
Linear Algebra/Representing Linear Maps with Matrices - Wikibooks, open books for an open world
the spaces are given to be
where the bases are
and the action of h on B is given by
and the final mapping is:
which only makes some sense to me. I really don't know how to set the equations in D to map to these values and don't remember ever going over it in this book (specifically, moving from a space larger than the target space which is the case here, R3 --> P1). What's really confusing is the two negative maps for -x. I can see how maybe one is arrived at by this procedure:
1 + x
-1 + x
(1p --> 2p)
0 + 2x =
(where we then add our value from R3)
0 + 2x = - x
x = -1/2
??????
I don't believe this is correct but I really have no idea how this was done. I also notice that doing the dot product from the final maps to R3 gives us our initial values, for example:
-1/2*(1 + x) + -1/2*(-1 + x) =
(-1/2 - 1/2x) + (1/2 -1/2x) =
- 1/2x -1/2x =
-x
??? Please help!
h is a linear map from R^3 to P1. any linear map is completely determined by its action on a basis. rather than describe h abstractly in terms of its image on an arbitrary domain element (which is the usual way we describe a function), we can assign NUMERICAL values to a matrix which "gives us the same information".
these numbers (the entries in our matrix representation of h) aren't intrinsic to the mapping h, they depend on a choice of basis for the domain and co-domain.
now, we are given that h((0,0,1)) = -x, h((0,2,0)) = 2, and h((2,0,0)) = 4. but to construct the matrix for h relative to the bases B and D, we need to express these images of the basis element of B in terms of D = {1+x, -1+x}, in other words, their D-coordinates.
let's look at the first one: h((0,0,1)) = -x. how can we express -x as a(1+x) + b(-1+x)?
well, a(1+x) + b(-1+x) = a + ax -b + bx = (a-b) + (a+b)x. if we want this to equal -x, we should like:
a-b = 0, so a = b, and a+b = -1, so 2a = -1, so a = -1/2, and thus b = -1/2 as well. so -x = [-1/2,-1/2]D.
in a similar vein, the D-coordinates of 2 are [1,-1]D, and the D-coordinates of 4 are [2,-2]D.
now, (0,0,1), our first element of B, in B-coordinates is [1,0,0]B (kind of confusing, right? think of it this way:
call the elements of B, b1,b2,b3. since (0,0,1) = b1, what we really mean by [1,0,0]B is 1b1 + 0b2 + 0b3 = b1).
the matrix of h (let's call it M) should satisfy the following:
M[1,0,0]Bᵀ = [-1/2,-1/2]Dᵀ or in matrix form:
but by actually doing the multiplication on the left, we get that [1,0,0]B picks out the first column of M. similarly, M[0,1,0]Bᵀ picks out the 2nd column of M (which reflects h's action on b2 = (0,2,0)), and M[0,0,1]Bᵀ gives us the 3rd column of M.
therefore, M has the images of the B basis elements (in D-coordinates) as its columns, so