So I'm reading this document that has a proof of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, and I'm missing the logic.
It says, "By Proposition 2.3 and (i) of Proposition 2.5, we have (assuming , otherwise, nothing needs to be proved)" (The propositions referenced basically establish the linearity of dot-product, and that the norm is always non-negative.)
I get everything here except the last inequality. I see that it reduces to this:
but I don't see why I'm supposed to believe this.
Also, tangentially, can anyone tell me what's wrong with this proof?: