So I'm reading this document that has a proof of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, and I'm missing the logic.
It says, "By Proposition 2.3 and (i) of Proposition 2.5, we have (assuming, otherwise, nothing needs to be proved)" (The propositions referenced basically establish the linearity of dot-product, and that the norm is always non-negative.)
.
I get everything here except the last inequality. I see that it reduces to this:
but I don't see why I'm supposed to believe this.
Also, tangentially, can anyone tell me what's wrong with this proof?:
![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



