Hi,

one of my books states the inequality as

for all ,

and says thatequalityholds if and only if for

.

To me it looks like equality holds if for any :

I do not understand why it has to be .

Could someone please clear it up a bit? Thanks.

Printable View

- February 8th 2011, 11:49 PMMollierCauchy-Schwarz inequality
Hi,

one of my books states the inequality as

for all ,

and says that*equality*holds if and only if for

.

To me it looks like equality holds if for any :

I do not understand why it has to be .

Could someone please clear it up a bit? Thanks. - February 9th 2011, 12:36 AMFernandoRevilla
The result is the following:

You have proven .

To prove you'll need to choose a particular .

Fernando Revilla - February 9th 2011, 02:04 AMMollier
- February 9th 2011, 04:25 AMFernandoRevilla

If the equality is trivial and is linearly dependent . If decompose:

Using , prove that and .

That is or equivalently being .

Fernando Revilla