I more or less copied the following notes from my professor:
Everything about this proof makes perfect sense to me except the part in bold: Why is

a subgroup (isomorphic) of

? It cannot be simply because

acts on the four roots (because for instance any group of any order acts on any set trivially). All I can tell from that is that there is a homomorphism from

into

. So, how do I conclude that

is a subgroup (isomorphic) of

?
Also, I'm a bit confused as to how it can be that

. For each

is completely determined by
)
and
![\alpha(\sqrt[4]{2})](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\alpha(\sqrt[4]{2}))
. Now,
=\alpha(-i^2)=-\alpha(i)^2)
, which seems to imply
=i)
. But then
![\alpha(\sqrt[4]{2})](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\alpha(\sqrt[4]{2}))
must be one of the four roots. So

, a contradiction. Where did I go wrong, I wonder?
Any help would be much appreciated!