Results 1 to 4 of 4

- May 26th 2010, 08:11 PM #1

- Joined
- May 2010
- Posts
- 12

- May 27th 2010, 01:24 AM #2

- May 27th 2010, 05:01 AM #3

- Joined
- May 2010
- Posts
- 12

- May 27th 2010, 06:10 AM #4
Personally, I would do question (b), then extend it for all primes p. This is the contrapositive of (a)*, so you are done.

That is a bit roundabout though, so there may be an easier way...

*The contrapositive: Instead of proving you prove . These two things are equivalent.