I had an exam question on this the other day! To show that 1.,2. imply 3. on it's easiest to show it for first, then , and then . I'll give you some hints!
(n) Try induction to show that . This is obvious for , and so assume it is true for . Then From here you can use 1. and the inductive hypothesis. The symmetric case, i.e. for follows from 2.
(z) Then for , it suffices to show that (why?). Consider and use 1. Again use 2. for the symmetric case.
(q) Now for , it suffices to show (why?). Now consider and use (n).
Hope this is helpful, write back if you get stuck
(I don't know why I just used a smiley I think they're stupid but I was endeared by the yellowness.)