Results 1 to 4 of 4

Math Help - t^3-3t+1 splits or is irreducible

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    12

    t^3-3t+1 splits or is irreducible

    Prove that for any field K, t^3-3t+1 splits or is irreducible in K.

    Hint: show that any zero is a rational expression in any other zero.

    Using the formula for the sum of roots: \sum \alpha_i = \frac{-a_{n-1}}{a_n} where \alpha_i are the roots, and a_i the coefficients of the i-th power term in the polynomial, we get \alpha_1+\alpha_2+\alpha_3=0

    Also using the formula for the product of the roots: \prod \alpha_i=(-1)^n (\frac{a_0}{a_n}) \ we get \alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3=-1

    I only seem to be able to combine these equations, and the equations resulting from the fact that each \alpha_i is a root of our polynomial to get equations of two variables where a power higher than 1 is present in each variable, and quadratic formulas don't seem to resolve those nicely. I think if I'm reading the problem right, we don't want any roots in our relating equation so I guess we need another rational expression (other than \alpha_1+\alpha_2+\alpha_3=0) involving the three roots to combine with the previous to get a rational expression involving two roots.

    Ideas?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor chiph588@'s Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    From
    Champaign, Illinois
    Posts
    1,163
    Assuming this is the right path to go down, you could get a third equation from the coefficient of  t , namely  \alpha_1\alpha_2+\alpha_2\alpha_3+\alpha_1\alpha_3  =-3 .

    Now you have three equations and three unknowns. See if that does the trick. See here for more info.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    12
    Ok, using that information relating coefficients of our polynomial to symmetric polynomials in the roots I have the equations:

    0=\alpha_1+\alpha_2+\alpha_3

    -3=\alpha_1\alpha_2+\alpha_2\alpha_3+\alpha_1\alpha  _3

    -1=\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3

    or solving for \alpha_1 so I can directly relate two variables:
    \alpha_1=-\alpha_2-\alpha_3=-\frac{1}{\alpha_2 \alpha3}=\frac{-3-\alpha_2 \alpha_3}{\alpha_2+\alpha_3}

    When I manipulate those equations, I just seem to get things like \alpha_2^n*\alpha_3^m*p(\alpha_2)=0 where p is the original polynomial and this just confirms that my variables are roots ( I already know they're nonzero).

    It's not enough to simply solve for one root in terms of another. I have to relate them using only add/subtr, mult/div (no radicals).

    Am I perhaps starting off with the wrong approach?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    12
    The problem became much easier once I actually solved for the roots and got them in a good looking form, namely \alpha_1=2cos(2\pi/9),\alpha_2=2sin(\pi/18),\alpha_3=-2cos(\pi/9)
    I ended up only using one of the prior formulas \alpha_1+\alpha_2+\alpha_3=0 and the double angle formulas.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 10th 2011, 10:41 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 5th 2010, 03:54 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 20th 2010, 11:50 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 10th 2010, 08:05 AM
  5. [SOLVED] Help with % splits
    Posted in the Business Math Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 27th 2006, 06:00 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum