Let I want to show Any hints? (For , the field generated by over is defined to be the smallest subfield of which contains both and , denoted by ) Thanks
Last edited by bram kierkels; Apr 1st 2010 at 03:51 AM.
Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+
Originally Posted by bram kierkels Let I want to show Any hints? (For , the field generated by over is defined to be the smallest subfield of which contains both and , denoted by ) Thanks . Since clearly , it is impossible that ... Now, I'm guessing you may have wanted to prove , but then the first part must be enough to show the way to prove what you want. Tonio
Originally Posted by bram kierkels Let I want to show for some Conversely, for some Hence
View Tag Cloud