Oh, sorry. Did you know what I meant though? I turned the set into a matrix by multiplying by scalars c1, c2..cn. By looking at them as like linear combinations.
Ex:
S={2,x,x+3,3x^2}
(0,0,0) = c1(0,0,2)+c2(0,1,0)+c3(0,1,3)+c4(3,0,0).
And then it becomes a matrix from this system:
0c1+0c2+0c3+3c4=0
0c1+1c2+1c3+0c4=0
2c1+0c1+3c3+0c4=0
and it reduced to
[[1, 0, 3/2, 0], [0,1,1,0], [0,0,0,1]]
So I said non-trivial and therefore dependent. And now I want to see if it's a spanning set so that i can tell if it forms a basis for p2. I guess it wouldn't because it's dependent anyways.. but I'd still like to know how to find if something if it spans p2 / if it's a spanning set. Thanks you!!
Oh, now we're talking college/university level...almost! So you have a set of polynomials and you want to check whether this set spans some vector space of polynomials...right? What space I've no idea, but your writing the polynomials as coordinate vectors is a very good idea to find out whether the set is linearly independent or not. Sinceyou wrote the polynomials as 3-D coordinate vectors I deduce we're talking here of the v.s. of all (real...? complex...?) polynomials of degree less than or equal 2, and since this v.s.'s dimension is 3 we already know this set must be lin. dependent, so its only chance to be a spanning set is if we can dig out of it a set with 3 lin. ind. vectors. What you did is correct, and now it isn't hard to check that is lin. ind. and thus a basis and, thus again, a spanning set of the vector space (if I guessed correctly and the v.s. is what I said it is).
Tonio
Thanks. I think I get it. The x+3 is redundant, thus linearly dependent. So while it does span p2, it does not form a basis for S in p2. However, the set, {2,x,3x^2} spans p2 AND is linearly independent, so that one is thus a basis. Not the original set though.
Yes?
Another one from our text book.
15. Find a basis for the subspace of R^3 spanned by S.
{(4,4,8),(1,1,2),(1,1,1)}
It would seem to me that (4,4,8) can be written as a linear combination of the other two (4 times (1,1,2)). So I would think that it would be dependent. And (1,1,2) and (1,1,1) by themselves can't span R^3. I would think there would be no basis for this one. But the book lists this as an answer:
{(1,1,0),(0,0,1)}
Looks like they got that by row reducing. But is the book wrong or am I super confused still? I would say there is no basis.