Sart from the coset!
can you find all the cosets ? Do you see that it is similar to something we have learned for years?
Do not be confused by the notation, try to understand what the representation really is.
So I really feel lost on Quotient groups, I just dont get the concept. My book gives a simple example...
( )/ ( <0>)
Could someone explain to me what the construction of this is explicitly and what its structure is?
Im really hoping that I can get the concept with this example. Thanks
Look, I appreciate you taking the time to write things.
But I dont understand the idea of a quotient group from the very beginning.
The reason I used this example, because It is a problem out of the book. I thought it was complex enough, yet simple enough to demonstrate the idea.
I need you to tell what im looking at. I need you to tell me what it is i should see when I see this type of notation.
Please just write what it is. So I can learn from it.
Basically, a homomorphic image of a group is another group which preserves all the rules of your previous group (if the pre-image is abelian, so will the image, if then , etc.) However, other we can add other requirements to the group. For instance, if we take a non-abelian group we could force the image to be abelian (formally, we quotient out something called the derived subgroup). If you think about the kernel of this image, will be in this kernel. So, we have added a restriction to the image - the image is abelian. We can do lots of things - we can, for instance, dictate that every element has finite order.
However, there are some things you cannot do. Everything must conform to the operations of the group in the pre-image. For instance, if you have an element of order in the pre-image then it must have an order that divides in the image.
Basically, homomorphic images, and thus quotients, restrict the group we are looking at. At least, that is how I look at them.
I hope I haven't confused you too much.