Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: undefined

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    59

    undefined

    Division by zero is undefined. How would you justify this ?
    Thank you all,
    Last edited by Judi; Jan 26th 2007 at 10:09 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Super Member
    earboth's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    From
    Germany
    Posts
    5,854
    Thanks
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by Judi View Post
    Division by zero is undefined. How would you justify this ?
    Thank you all,
    Hello, Judi,

    normally you are told that you get the result 1 if you divide a number by itself.

    If you permit this result at $\displaystyle \frac{0}{0}=1$ then the value of all numbers isn't unique anymore.

    An example:

    $\displaystyle 3 \cdot 0 = 8 \cdot 0$. Now divide both sides of this equation by zero:

    $\displaystyle \frac{3 \cdot 0}{0} = \frac{8 \cdot 0}{0}$. According to the assumption you can cancel out the zeros and you'll get

    $\displaystyle 3 \cdot 1= 8\cdot 1$

    For me as a customer this method has some advantages: My next car costs only $1.00, because $1.00 is the same as $32,499.00

    EB
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Global Moderator

    Joined
    Nov 2005
    From
    New York City
    Posts
    10,616
    Thanks
    10
    There is nothing wrong with what Earboth said, but I presume you want a more algebraic answer.

    When I was a young boy a long time ago it used to bother me as well. Until I learned what a ring was, and I was happy. I will assume you are familar with the terms I am about to use.

    Given a ring $\displaystyle <R,+,\cdot>$, we know that $\displaystyle <R,+>$ is an abelian group. We know that $\displaystyle a(b+c)=ab+ac$ and $\displaystyle (b+c)a=ba+ca$. Using these definitions we can show that $\displaystyle 0x=x0=0$, because $\displaystyle x0=x(y-y)=xy-xy=0$ and $\displaystyle 0x=(y-y)x=yx-yx=0$. A ring with unity is a ring such that $\displaystyle <R,\cdot>$ has identity which we call $\displaystyle 1$. And we define a unit to be any element that has an inverse. The above theorem shows that if $\displaystyle 1\not = 0$ (meaning the identity for addition is not the identity for multiplication) then $\displaystyle 0$ cannot be a unit (meaning 1/0 does not exist). The only case when this can be is when $\displaystyle 1=0$, that is in a trivial ring of a single element (excerise). Thus, in general, for a general ring with more than one element, it cannot contain all units. The best we can do are all non-zero elements are units, that is called a division ring.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. infinity and undefined
    Posted in the Number Theory Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Mar 8th 2012, 01:07 AM
  2. is this logarithm undefined?
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Apr 8th 2010, 03:24 AM
  3. The UNDEFINED integral.
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: May 25th 2009, 07:05 PM
  4. undefined
    Posted in the Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jul 30th 2008, 04:54 AM
  5. undefined function.....
    Posted in the Advanced Algebra Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug 27th 2005, 11:21 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum