What areand
naturally equivalent to?
Okay I'm stuck in this one, I know what a natural equivalence is, but my problem is I don't really understand whatdoes, I know it reverses all arrows in the Category but I don't get what changes by doing that.
What areand
naturally equivalent to?
Okay I'm stuck in this one, I know what a natural equivalence is, but my problem is I don't really understand whatdoes, I know it reverses all arrows in the Category but I don't get what changes by doing that.
In wiki (link), an opposite category or dual category ofof a given category C is formed by reversing the morphisms. It means the objects of
are just the objects of C and the arrows of
are arrows
in a one to one correspondence manner (if an arrow of C is
, then
in
is
. I assume you already know this one.
Now consider some examples. Let S be a functor from the category ofto category of B such that
. It assigns to each object
an object Sc of B and to each arrow
of
an arrow
of B.
Here is another example. Ifis a functor from the category of C to the category of B, then we can define a functor from
. In this case,
can be applied to both, where c is an object of both C and C^{op} (Remember that objects remain same in the dual category). However,
should be changed to
for the latter one.

this question is not easy to answer! right now i have no idea what categoryis equivalent to but it is known that
is equivalent to the category of compact abelian groups (continuous
homomorphisms are the morphisms of this category). the idea is to associate to any abelian groupthe abelian group of its characters, i.e.
where
is the circle group.
we also associate to any homomorphismthe morphism
defined by
the topology on
is the pointwise convergence topology on
where
is the set
of all functionsthere are so much details here to be proved and you probably can find find them in some textbooks.